The Healthy Future of Slovakia initiative is the flagship of the Future Slovakia Forum think tank. Healthcare for us is not just clinical medicine – it's about transparency, public finance, digitalisation, and effective state governance.
Reforms aren't built on election day. They are built months and years beforehand — in data, debates, mentoring, analytical work, and teams that turn ideas into actionable proposals.
This is not a membership or an automated donation. It's a partnership supporting specific analytical capacity. After filling out the form, we will contact you personally.
When they open, the country cannot start from scratch. It needs ready reform proposals, data, budget frameworks, implementation steps, and people who can carry them into practice.
Supporting FSF means funding people, time, data, mentoring, quality control, and public explanation. In other words: the capacity without which reforms remain only ideas.
Funds one monthly analytical slot for a student in an FSF research team. The output is a literature review, a data brief, an analytical note, or a section of a policy brief produced under a mentor. The amount covers the junior's analytical work, mentoring, QA, and coordination of the output.
Covers the full preparation of one quality policy brief: research, junior analyst time, senior expert mentoring, editing, fact-checking, visual treatment, and publication ready for decision-makers.
Enables preparation and hosting of an expert meeting, processing the outputs, publishing recommendations, and communicating them to both expert and broader public audiences.
A contribution to the bridge fund that sustains analytical, fundraising, and coordination capacity during the period when large institutional grants are being evaluated and contracted. The current bridge fund target for 2026 is €20,000.
Covers a junior position (4 hours / week for 12 months). Role: monitor grant calls, read programme documentation, and prepare decision briefs for FSF leadership. (Approx. CZK 52,000 in a Czech student context.)
Covers a junior position (5 hours / week for 12 months). Role: translate a policy brief, data chart, or expert output into an understandable visual or explainer without distorting the original meaning. (Approx. CZK 65,000.)
We combine senior expertise with the drive of the rising generation of Slovak analysts and students abroad.
No single part is enough on its own. Systemic problems aren't solved by a charismatic minister. They need infrastructure that outlasts institutions.
A real, measurable, and politically unsustainable problem that can no longer be ignored.
A proposal grounded in data, good practice, and method — one that withstands both expert scrutiny and implementation.
Leaders and public institutions willing to bear the cost of change on the basis of verified, hard data.
We bring together four layers that together make the difference between "we had a good idea" and "this is ready to use tomorrow".
We connect experts across healthcare, education, public finance, decentralisation, institutions, and democratic resilience.
We engage Slovak students — especially in the Czech Republic — in real analytical work under the guidance of mentors and experts.
We produce policy briefs, reform maps, analytical notes, roundtables, and public explanation of reforms.
Serious reform work needs project management, fundraising, financial planning, QA, reporting, communications, and impact measurement.
In recent months FSF has been building community in Prague, Brno, and Olomouc. From summer 2026 we enter the pilot analytical phase.
We test the collaboration, working culture, ability to work with primary sources, and delivery of outputs on time.
Students choose one reform vertical and submit a short analytical vision.
Students who demonstrate quality and discipline can receive a paid analytical position in one of the FSF research teams.
The pipeline from assignment to published output — without which expertise is just an email in an inbox.
An expert defines the problem, the hypothesis, and the expected output.
A junior analyst works with primary sources, data, legislation, and international comparisons.
A senior expert reviews methodology, facts, logic, and recommendations. (QA = quality assurance — expert review before publication.)
The output becomes a policy brief, explainer, graphic, roundtable input, or material for public debate.
Strategic partnerships and programmes you can join — either by support or by connecting us with other actors.
Internal processes, fundraising, and impact measurement.
Student policy talent pipeline involving Charles University.
Regional health policy with partners from Slovakia, Czech Republic, and Poland.
Reform framework for healthcare 2027 – 2035: data, experts, implementation.
FSF is a non-partisan, independent, evidence-based think tank. In private partnerships we strictly separate support for the organisation from influence over content. A donor does not have the right to determine expert conclusions.
Every partnership goes through conflict-of-interest screening and a reputational review. For larger private partnerships we respect internal source-diversification rules (private sponsorship is capped at 25 % of the total budget).
Not an automated donation form. Leave us your contact and we'll get back to you with a proposal for a short call about ways to collaborate.
We have received your message. We'll get in touch to agree on a suitable form of collaboration.
Please try again or email us directly at david.boruta@future-slovakia.eu.
No. FSF is a non-partisan, independent, evidence-based think tank. Partnership with us does not mean support for any political party.
No. A corporate partner or foundation can support capacity building or a specific topic that aligns with the FSF mission, but can never intervene in expert conclusions, data, or methodology.
Yes. A partner can support a specific area or type of capacity — for example analytical talent, a policy brief, or the bridge fund. They cannot, however, determine expert conclusions, methodology, or the content of the output itself.
Of course. For corporate partnerships we conclude a standard donation agreement (or a collaboration agreement depending on the form of support) that meets all accounting and legal requirements.
Depending on the agreement, type of support, and legal obligations. For corporate and foundation partnerships we prefer transparent communication, while respecting reasonable confidentiality rules where justified.
Help us prepare things that can actually be used in practice. The country needs people with the capacity to keep going. Become a partner of change, future, and prosperity.